A proposed standard for asserting that the content of a site is human-made, not AI-made. I'm not convinced, and it doesnt seem too far removed from the much-older humans.txt, but it's also lightweight and seems well-meaning.
Willingness to look stupid is a genuine moat in creative work
It's not exactly a new take, but I like how this is worded: the better you get at something, the less likely you are to take risks; mainly because you know it's a risk at that point.
MCP Vulnerabilities Every Developer Should Know - Composio
I've not really got into the whole MCP thing yet. I know it's a thing, I just haven't really paid proper attention to it. This feels like a thing I should file away for future reference.
I'm seeing the rise of a "serve Markdown when asked" and "you need llms.txt" movement, driven by the idea that LLMs/AI is the new source of visits. While there might be some merit to this idea, what does seem to be interesting is that the facts of what's happening when you provide those things don't seem to match the claims.
No right to relicense this project · Issue #327 · chardet/chardet
Well this is a whole furball of legal and AI issues. I think the thing that gets me here is the apparent motives of the current maint'. It doesn't matter how you cut it with the legal side of things, what they've done, for me, is a real ethical issue.
My vibe-coded startup was exploited. I lost $2500 in stripe fees. 175 customers were charged $500 each, before i was able to rotate API keys. I still don't blame Claude Code. I trusted it too much.… | Anton Karbanovich | 316 comments
LinkedIn post where someone posts a lesson from their own experience, but they don't seem to realise the real lesson they're posting and they don't seem to be learning from it.
Reminds me of a program I used to mess with back in the late 90s (I think it was). I forget the name, might have been Terragen or similar. This has a similar vibe.