I didn't know this was a site, and now I'm glad I know this is a site. What got me here was the drama around this particular app. It's got everything: claims of unfair treatment, claims of unfair portrayal of an application, claims of copying by AI, the works. Well worth a read.
Too many people who are pushing for LLMs and agents in a business environment seem to fail to understand that you can't replace expertise with them.
I feel many organisations will find this out too late.
The FSF, in effect, do what the FSF is there to do: defend the copyright of GNU Emacs. Meanwhile someone attempts to contribute a patch written by a large language model, and seemingly gets offended that it's rejected. I think the worst part about it is they seem to think that being honest about using an LLM should let their contribution in.
An article in which the author talks about the con played by psychics, and how large language models pretty much do exactly the same thing.
Pretty fun anti-AI AGENTS.md file.
I wonder if it works?
Summary: The water usage of AI data centres is not a significant environmental issue. While data centres do use water, primarily for cooling, their water consumption is minimal compared to other industries and daily activities. The concern is often based on misconceptions and misleading statistics, rather than a comprehensive understanding of the data and the broader context of water usage.
I see this brought up a lot, and while I understand the concern, I'm always a litle skeptical that it's what people trot out. Keeping this so I can refer back to it, and for further investigation.